论文标题
高红移SFR-M*关系对使用的恒星形成率和出色的质量指标敏感:解决观测和模拟之间的张力
The high redshift SFR-M* relation is sensitive to the employed star formation rate and stellar mass indicators: Towards addressing the tension between observations and simulations
论文作者
论文摘要
观察到的恒星形成率(SFR) - 恒星质量($ {\ rm m} _ {\ star} $)之间存在严重的张力。此外,观察结果尚未通过最新的宇宙学模拟成功再现,这些模拟往往会在固定的$ {\ rm m} _ {\ star} $下预测2-4个较小的SFR。我们使用从Eagle Simulations采样的星系的裙子模拟光谱分布来检查$ z = 1-4 $星系的SFR $ - {\ rm M} _ {\ star} $关系。我们通过模仿不同的观察技术来得出SFR和恒星质量。我们发现,如果使用类似的方法来推断星系属性,则观察到的SFR $ - {\ rm m} _ {\ star} $之间的张力在很大程度上会减轻。我们发现关系依赖红外波长(例如24 $ {\rmμm} $,mips -24、70和160 $ {\rmμm} $或尖峰-250,350,500 $ {\ rmμm} $)超过了固有的关系。依靠光谱能量分布拟合技术的关系低估了固定恒星质量的SFRS -0.5 dex at $ z \ sim 4 $,但过度预测的测量值为0.3 dex at $ z \ sim 1 $。依赖于尘埃校正的紫外线液体的关系是平坦的,因为它们过度预测/低估的sfrs对于低/高恒星形成对象,并且从0.10 dex到$ z \ sim 4 $的固有关系偏离固有关系偏离。我们建议,不同的观察性研究之间的严重张力可以通过以下事实来广泛解释:不同的群体采用不同的技术来推断其SFR。
There is a severe tension between the observed star formation rate (SFR) - stellar mass (${\rm M}_{\star}$) relations reported by different authors at $z = 1-4$. In addition, the observations have not been successfully reproduced by state-of-the-art cosmological simulations which tend to predict a factor of 2-4 smaller SFRs at a fixed ${\rm M}_{\star}$. We examine the evolution of the SFR$-{\rm M}_{\star}$ relation of $z = 1-4 $ galaxies using the SKIRT simulated spectral energy distributions of galaxies sampled from the EAGLE simulations. We derive SFRs and stellar masses by mimicking different observational techniques. We find that the tension between observed and simulated SFR$-{\rm M}_{\star}$ relations is largely alleviated if similar methods are used to infer the galaxy properties. We find that relations relying on infrared wavelengths (e.g. 24 ${\rm μm}$, MIPS - 24, 70 and 160 ${\rm μm}$ or SPIRE - 250, 350, 500 ${\rm μm}$) have SFRs that exceed the intrinsic relation by 0.5 dex. Relations that rely on the spectral energy distribution fitting technique underpredict the SFRs at a fixed stellar mass by -0.5 dex at $z \sim 4$ but overpredict the measurements by 0.3 dex at $z \sim 1$. Relations relying on dust-corrected rest-frame UV luminosities, are flatter since they overpredict/underpredict SFRs for low/high star forming objects and yield deviations from the intrinsic relation from 0.10 dex to -0.13 dex at $z \sim 4$. We suggest that the severe tension between different observational studies can be broadly explained by the fact that different groups employ different techniques to infer their SFRs.