论文标题
国家和国际多元隶属关系对引文影响的影响
The effect of national and international multiple affiliations on citation impact
论文作者
论文摘要
在当前的科学环境中越来越多地看到了隶属多个机构的研究人员。在本文中，我们系统地分析了多收成的作者身份及其对引文影响的影响，重点是研究合作的科学输出。通过考虑每个机构的国籍，我们进一步区分了国家多恋爱的作者和国际多收成的作者身份，并揭示了它们在学科和国家之间的不同模式。我们在研究合作中观察到具有多重依恋作者身份（45.6％）的大量出版物，其中包含国家相关和生物学与生物学相关学科的全国多重债务作者的大量出版物，以及在太空科学，物理学和地球科学中包含国际类型的大量出版物。对于基于国家 /地区的观点，我们将国内和外国的多物种作者与特定国家区分开来。以七国集团和金砖制度为不同的S＆T水平的样本，我们发现国内国内多收成的作者与大多数G7国家学科的引文影响有关，而国内国际国际多收成的作者对大多数国土国家的影响更大。
Researchers affiliated with multiple institutions are increasingly seen in current scientific environment. In this paper we systematically analyze the multi-affiliated authorship and its effect on citation impact, with focus on the scientific output of research collaboration. By considering the nationality of each institutions, we further differentiate the national multi-affiliated authorship and international multi-affiliated authorship and reveal their different patterns across disciplines and countries. We observe a large share of publications with multi-affiliated authorship (45.6%) in research collaboration, with a larger share of publications containing national multi-affiliated authorship in medicine related and biology related disciplines, and a larger share of publications containing international type in Space Science, Physics and Geosciences. To a country-based view, we distinguish between domestic and foreign multi-affiliated authorship to a specific country. Taking G7 and BRICS countries as samples from different S&T level, we find that the domestic national multi-affiliated authorship relate to more on citation impact for most disciplines of G7 countries, while domestic international multi-affiliated authorships are more positively influential for most BRICS countries.
