论文标题
我们从四十年的语义干扰研究中学到了什么?贝叶斯荟萃分析
What did we learn from forty years of research on semantic interference? A Bayesian metaanalysis
论文作者
论文摘要
当实验中的参与者必须命名图片的同时忽略图片上叠加的干扰词单词或受理呈现的(即图片字的干扰范式)时,他们会花更多的时间命名(或目标)单词来自同一语义类别(例如,catog)。这种实验效应称为语义干扰效应,可能是语言生产文献中研究最多的效果之一。然而,效果的功能起源及其发生的确切条件仍在辩论中。自从Lupker报告了大约40年前的第一个响应时间实验中的效果以来,已经进行了300多个类似的实验。语义干扰效应在许多实验中得到了复制,但是一些研究也报道了在实验条件的一部分中缺乏效果。本研究的目的是对迄今为止现有的证据进行全面的理论综述,并提供几个贝叶斯荟萃分析和荟萃回归,以确定效果的大小,并探索效果表面的实验条件。根据有关语义干扰效应的功能起源的当前辩论及其对我们对语言生产系统的理解的影响,讨论了结果。
When participants in an experiment have to name pictures while ignoring distractor words superimposed on the picture or presented auditorily (i.e., picture-word interference paradigm), they take more time when the word to be named (or target) and distractor words are from the same semantic category (e.g., cat-dog). This experimental effect is known as the semantic interference effect, and is probably one of the most studied in the language production literature. The functional origin of the effect and the exact conditions in which it occurs are however still debated. Since Lupker reported the effect in the first response time experiment about 40 years ago, more than 300 similar experiments have been conducted. The semantic interference effect was replicated in many experiments, but several studies also reported the absence of an effect in a subset of experimental conditions. The aim of the present study is to provide a comprehensive theoretical review of the existing evidence to date and several Bayesian meta-analyses and meta-regressions to determine the size of the effect and explore the experimental conditions in which the effect surfaces. The results are discussed in the light of current debates about the functional origin of the semantic interference effect and its implications for our understanding of the language production system.