论文标题
COVID-19的疾病引起的牛群免疫水平大大低于经典的牛群免疫水平
The disease-induced herd immunity level for Covid-19 is substantially lower than the classical herd immunity level
论文作者
论文摘要
尽管采取了各种预防措施,但大多数国家仍处于持续的19009年大流行。一个普遍的问题是,一个国家或地区是否以及何时将达到牛群免疫$ h $。经典的牛群免疫级别$ H_C $定义为$ H_C = 1-1/R_0 $,其中$ R_0 $是基本复制号,对于Covid-19估计,根据国家和地区,估计在2.2-3.5范围内。这里表明,在采用一套预防措施的国家/地区疫情发生了爆发后,疾病引起的群疫苗水平$ h_d $实际上大于$ h_c $。 As an illustration we show that if $R_0=2.5$ in an age-structured community with mixing rates fitted to social activity studies, and also categorizing individuals into three categories: low active, average active and high active, and where preventive measures affect all mixing rates proportionally, then the disease-induced herd immunity level is $h_D=43\%$ rather than $h_C=1-1/2.5=60\%$.因此,要出现牛群的免疫需要较低的分数。根本的原因是,当疾病扩散引起免疫力时,接触率高的组中感染的比例大于接触率较低的组。因此,疾病诱导的免疫力比在经典牛群免疫水平上均匀分布在社区中的免疫力均匀。
Most countries are suffering severely from the ongoing covid-19 pandemic despite various levels of preventive measures. A common question is if and when a country or region will reach herd immunity $h$. The classical herd immunity level $h_C$ is defined as $h_C=1-1/R_0$, where $R_0$ is the basic reproduction number, for covid-19 estimated to lie somewhere in the range 2.2-3.5 depending on country and region. It is shown here that the disease-induced herd immunity level $h_D$, after an outbreak has taken place in a country/region with a set of preventive measures put in place, is actually substantially smaller than $h_C$. As an illustration we show that if $R_0=2.5$ in an age-structured community with mixing rates fitted to social activity studies, and also categorizing individuals into three categories: low active, average active and high active, and where preventive measures affect all mixing rates proportionally, then the disease-induced herd immunity level is $h_D=43\%$ rather than $h_C=1-1/2.5=60\%$. Consequently, a lower fraction infected is required for herd immunity to appear. The underlying reason is that when immunity is induced by disease spreading, the proportion infected in groups with high contact rates is greater than that in groups with low contact rates. Consequently, disease-induced immunity is stronger than when immunity is uniformly distributed in the community as in the classical herd immunity level.