论文标题
对无关的开放访问效果：通过纪律，来源类型和可见性控制的大规模研究
Open Access effect on uncitedness: A large-scale study controlling by discipline, source type and visibility
论文作者
论文摘要
发表后的第一年，有许多因素会影响未被未被未被关注的可能性。在这项研究中，我们分析了这些因素的三个因素，会议论文集和书籍系列：领域（在Scopus数据库的316个主题类别中），访问方式（开放访问与付费访问）和来源的可见性（通过主题类别的平均影响百分比）。我们量化了这些因素对未被发现的概率的影响。该概率是通过在发布后大约两年的Scopus数据库串行来源中未经认证的文档的百分比来衡量的。作为主要结果，我们没有发现开放访问与无关紧要之间的任何牢固的相关性。在大多数被引用的期刊（第1季度和前10％）的组中，开放访问期刊通常具有较低的未识别费率。但是，在中间四分位数（Q2和Q3）中，几乎没有观察到差异，而对于Q4，在OA组的情况下，未认识的速率再次较低。这很重要，因为它在有关开放访问引用优势的辩论中提供了新的证据。
There are many factors that affect the probability of being uncited during the first years after publication. In this study, we analyze three of these factors for journals, conference proceedings and book series: the field (in 316 subject categories of the Scopus database), the access modality (open access vs. paywalled), and the visibility of the source (through the percentile of the average impact in the subject category). We quantify the effect of these factors on the probability of being uncited. This probability is measured through the percentage of uncited documents in the serial sources of the Scopus database at about two years after publication. As a main result, we do not find any strong correlation between open access and uncitedness. Within the group of most cited journals (Q1 and top 10%), open access journals generally have somewhat lower uncited rates. However, in the intermediate quartiles (Q2 and Q3) almost no differences are observed, while for Q4 the uncited rate is again somewhat lower in the case of the OA group. This is important because it provides new evidence in the debate about open access citation advantage.
