论文标题
银河环调查的自主高斯分解。 ii。 13CO的银河分布
Autonomous Gaussian decomposition of the Galactic Ring Survey. II. The Galactic distribution of 13CO
论文作者
论文摘要
关于在银河系中CO排放分布的知识对于了解银河环境对星际介质中结构的形成和演变的影响至关重要。但是,目前,我们对螺旋臂和武器间区域中CO分数的洞察力仍然受到假定旋转曲线模型或距离测定技术的大量不确定性的限制。在这项工作中,我们使用贝叶斯方法从银河环调查中获得13CO分布的当前最佳评估。我们进行了两个不同的距离估计,其中包括或排除了银河特征模型。我们还包括根据文献距离的汇编和假定的尺寸线宽关系确定的运动学距离歧义解的先验。我们发现,与螺旋臂特征相关的13CO发射的分数从两次距离之间的76%到84%不等。气体的垂直分布集中在银河中部平面周围,显示〜75 pc的FWHM值。我们没有发现与螺旋臂和手臂特征相关的气体排放特性之间没有任何显着差异。特别是,马刺和螺旋臂中气体发射的速度分散值的分布非常相似。我们检测到较高的速度分散值的趋势随着速度增加的距离,我们将其归因于空间分辨率差异引起的光束平均效应。我们认为,气体发射的真实分布可能与我们两个距离结果的组合更相似,并强调了使用互补距离估计来保护任何单个方法的陷阱的重要性。我们得出的结论是,这项工作中提出的方法是确定银河平面调查中气体排放特征距离的有前途的方法。
Knowledge about the distribution of CO emission in the Milky Way is essential to understand the impact of Galactic environment on the formation and evolution of structures in the interstellar medium. However, currently our insight about the fraction of CO in spiral arm and interarm regions is still limited by large uncertainties in assumed rotation curve models or distance determination techniques. In this work we use a Bayesian approach to obtain the current best assessment of the distribution of 13CO from the Galactic Ring Survey. We performed two different distance estimates that either included or excluded a model for Galactic features. We also include a prior for the solution of the kinematic distance ambiguity that was determined from a compilation of literature distances and an assumed size-linewidth relationship. We find that the fraction of 13CO emission associated with spiral arm features varies from 76% to 84% between the two distance runs. The vertical distribution of the gas is concentrated around the Galactic midplane showing FWHM values of ~75 pc. We do not find any significant difference between gas emission properties associated with spiral arm and interarm features. In particular the distribution of velocity dispersion values of gas emission in spurs and spiral arms is very similar. We detect a trend of higher velocity dispersion values with increasing heliocentric distance, which we attribute to beam averaging effects caused by differences in spatial resolution. We argue that the true distribution of the gas emission is likely more similar to a combination of our two distance results, and highlight the importance of using complementary distance estimations to safeguard against the pitfalls of any single approach. We conclude that the methodology presented in this work is a promising way to determine distances to gas emission features in Galactic plane surveys.