论文标题
选择使用卷积网络的ECG QRS检测的采样频率
Choosing a sampling frequency for ECG QRS detection using convolutional networks
论文作者
论文摘要
自动化QRS检测方法取决于以一定频率采样的ECG数据,无论基于滤波器的传统方法或基于卷积的深度学习方法如何。这些方法需要选择它们首先操作的采样频率。在处理来自两个不同数据集的数据时,这些数据集以不同的频率采样时,通常两个数据集的数据可能需要以通用目标频率进行重新采样,这可能是任何一个数据集的频率,也可能是不同的。但是,选择以一定频率采样的数据可能会影响模型的概括能力和复杂性。有一些研究研究了ECG样品频率对传统滤波器方法的影响,但是,对ECG样品频率对基于深度学习的模型(卷积网络)的影响进行了广泛的研究,探索了它们的普遍性和复杂性。这项实验研究研究了六个不同样本频率(50、100、250、500、1000和2000Hz)对四个不同卷积网络模型的通用性和复杂性的影响,以形成一个基础,以确定针对特定性能要求的QRS检测任务的适当样品频率。数据库内测试报告了从100Hz到250Hz的准确性提高不超过大约0.6 \%,并且对于所有基于CNN的模型,这两个频率较短。研究结果表明,基于卷积网络的深度学习模型能够在频率低至100Hz或250Hz的ECG信号上评分较高的检测精度,同时保持较低的模型复杂性(可训练的参数和训练时间的数量)。
Automated QRS detection methods depend on the ECG data which is sampled at a certain frequency, irrespective of filter-based traditional methods or convolutional network (CNN) based deep learning methods. These methods require a selection of the sampling frequency at which they operate in the very first place. While working with data from two different datasets, which are sampled at different frequencies, often, data from both the datasets may need to resample at a common target frequency, which may be the frequency of either of the datasets or could be a different one. However, choosing data sampled at a certain frequency may have an impact on the model's generalisation capacity, and complexity. There exist some studies that investigate the effects of ECG sample frequencies on traditional filter-based methods, however, an extensive study of the effect of ECG sample frequency on deep learning-based models (convolutional networks), exploring their generalisability and complexity is yet to be explored. This experimental research investigates the impact of six different sample frequencies (50, 100, 250, 500, 1000, and 2000Hz) on four different convolutional network-based models' generalisability and complexity in order to form a basis to decide on an appropriate sample frequency for the QRS detection task for a particular performance requirement. Intra-database tests report an accuracy improvement no more than approximately 0.6\% from 100Hz to 250Hz and the shorter interquartile range for those two frequencies for all CNN-based models. The findings reveal that convolutional network-based deep learning models are capable of scoring higher levels of detection accuracies on ECG signals sampled at frequencies as low as 100Hz or 250Hz while maintaining lower model complexity (number of trainable parameters and training time).