论文标题
通过添加EMG(ERASE)的来源 - 一种基于ICA的新型算法,用于从EEG中去除肌电伪影 - 第1部分1
Electromyogram (EMG) Removal by Adding Sources of EMG (ERASE) -- A novel ICA-based algorithm for removing myoelectric artifacts from EEG -- Part 1
论文作者
论文摘要
脑电图(EEG)的记录通常受到肌电图(EMG)伪影污染,尤其是在运动期间记录时。删除EMG工件的现有方法包括独立组件分析(ICA)和其他高阶统计方法。但是,这些方法无法有效地消除大多数EMG工件。在这里,我们提出了一个修改的ICA模型,用于脑电图中的EMG伪像去除,这称为EMG去除EMG(ERASE)(ERASE)。在这种新方法中,添加了从颈部和头部肌肉(参考文物)的其他EMG的其他通道作为ICA的输入,以“强制” EMG伪像的最大功率到少数独立的组件(ICS)。使用自动化程序确定并拒绝了含有EMG伪影的IC(“工件ICS”)。模拟结果表明,与常规ICA相比,删除了EEG的EMG伪像更有效。随后,脑电图从8位健康参与者中收集,同时他们动手测试了这种方法的现实功效。结果表明,擦除成功删除的EMG伪像(平均而言,使用真实EMG作为参考文物时,去除了约75%的EMG伪像),同时保留了与运动相关的预期EEG特征。我们还使用模拟的EMG作为参考工件(约63%的EMG伪像)测试了擦除程序。与传统的ICA相比,EEG的EMG伪像平均消除了26%。这些结果表明,使用其他真实或模拟的EMG源可以提高ICA在去除EEG中删除EMG伪影的有效性。结合自动伪影IC拒绝,擦除还可以最大程度地减少潜在的用户偏见。
Electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings are often contaminated by electromyographic (EMG) artifacts, especially when recording during movement. Existing methods to remove EMG artifacts include independent component analysis (ICA), and other high-order statistical methods. However, these methods can not effectively remove most of EMG artifacts. Here, we proposed a modified ICA model for EMG artifacts removal in the EEG, which is called EMG Removal by Adding Sources of EMG (ERASE). In this new approach, additional channels of real EMG from neck and head muscles (reference artifacts) were added as inputs to ICA in order to "force" the most power from EMG artifacts into a few independent components (ICs). The ICs containing EMG artifacts (the "artifact ICs") were identified and rejected using an automated procedure. Simulation results showed ERASE removed EMG artifacts from EEG significantly more effectively than conventional ICA. Subsequently, EEG was collected from 8 healthy participants while they moved their hands to test the realistic efficacy of this approach. Results showed that ERASE successfully removed EMG artifacts (on average, about 75% of EMG artifacts were removed when using real EMGs as reference artifacts) while preserving the expected EEG features related to movement. We also tested the ERASE procedure using simulated EMGs as reference artifacts (about 63% of EMG artifacts removed). Compared to conventional ICA, ERASE removed on average 26% more EMG artifacts from EEG. These results indicate that using additional real or simulated EMG sources can increase the effectiveness of ICA in removing EMG artifacts from EEG. Combined with automated artifact IC rejection, ERASE also minimizes potential user bias.