论文标题
工作场所的侵略使社会距离变得困难
Aggression in the workplace makes social distance difficult
论文作者
论文摘要
新冠状病毒（Covid-19）感染的传播不断增加。社会距离的实践吸引了人们的关注，以防止感染传播，但对于某些职业来说很难。因此，在先前的研究中，已经开发了确定社会距离的因素的规模。但是，目前尚不清楚如何选择其中的项目，并且似乎有些任意。为了应对这一趋势，本文通过基于某些规则进行探索性因素分析提取了八个量表，同时尽可能消除任意性。它们是不利的条件，领导，信息处理，对侵略性，机械运动，自主权，与外部的沟通以及横向团队合作的不利条件。在这些情况下，不利条件，对攻击性的反应和水平团队工作与身体接近性以及信息处理，机械运动，自主权和与外部的沟通有正相关，与物理接近性具有负相关性。此外，由于多元回归分析，结果表明，对侵略性的反应，而不是以前的研究中假定的团队合作，对物理接近的影响最大。
The spread of new coronavirus (COVID-19) infections continues to increase. The practice of social distance attracts attention as a measure to prevent the spread of infection, but it is difficult for some occupations. Therefore, in previous studies, the scale of factors that determine social distance has been developed. However, it was not clear how to select the items among them, and it seemed to be somewhat arbitrary. In response to this trend, this paper extracted eight scales by performing exploratory factor analysis based on certain rules while eliminating arbitrariness as much as possible. They were Adverse Conditions, Leadership, Information Processing, Response to Aggression, Mechanical Movement, Autonomy, Communication with the Outside, and Horizontal Teamwork. Of these, Adverse Conditions, Response to Aggression, and Horizontal Teamwork had a positive correlation with Physical Proximity, and Information Processing, Mechanical Movement, Autonomy, and Communication with the Outside had a negative correlation with Physical Proximity. Furthermore, as a result of multiple regression analysis, it was shown that Response to Aggression, not the mere teamwork assumed in previous studies, had the greatest influence on Physical Proximity.
