论文标题
在不同位置确定两个同步便携式氢时钟之间的地球电位差的初步实验结果
Preliminary experimental results of determining the geopotential difference between two synchronized portable hydrogen clocks at different locations
论文作者
论文摘要
在这里,我们基于分别位于北京和武汉的两个远程原子时钟之间的时间流逝比较,提供了地势测定的初步实验结果。在北京203 Institute Laboratory(BIL)同步了两个氢原子时钟后,将20天作为零基线校准,我们将一个时钟运送到Wuhan的Luojiashan时频电台(LTS),而无需停止其运行。根据共同的卫星时间传输(CVSTT)技术,进行了两个远程时钟之间的连续比较65天。集合经验模式分解(EEMD)技术用于删除原始CVSTT观测值中污染的无趣的周期性信号,以获得残留的时钟插图系列,从中确定了两个远程时钟之间的时间流逝。基于这两个时钟之间的累积时间流逝,确定了这两个站点之间的地球电位差。鉴于BIL的正交高度(OH),LT的OH是根据确定的地势差确定的。比较表明,LTS的OH的OH由时期比较确定的偏离与地球重力模型EGM2008确定的OH偏离约98 m。结果与我们的实验中应用的氢原子钟的频率稳定性一致。此外,我们使用了85天的原始观测值来确定基于CVSTT技术的两个远程站之间的地势差异。使用更精确的原子时钟或光学时钟,将来可以有效地应用地测量的CVSTT方法。
Here, we provide preliminary experimental results of the geopotential determination based on time elapse comparisons between two remote atomic clocks located at Beijing and Wuhan, respectively. After synchronizing two hydrogen atomic clocks at Beijing 203 Institute Laboratory (BIL) for 20 days as zero-baseline calibration, we transport one clock to Luojiashan Time-Frequency Station (LTS), Wuhan, without stopping its running. Continuous comparisons between the two remote clocks were conducted for 65 days based on the Common View Satellite Time Transfer (CVSTT) technique. The ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) technique is applied to removing the uninteresting periodic signals contaminated in the original CVSTT observations to obtain the residual clocks-offsets series, from which the time elapse between the two remote clocks was determined. Based on the accumulated time elapse between these two clocks the geopotential difference between these two stations was determined. Given the orthometric height (OH) of BIL, the OH of the LTS was determined based on the determined geopotential difference. Comparisons show that the OH of the LTS determined by time elapse comparisons deviates from that determined by Earth gravity model EGM2008 by about 98 m. The results are consistent with the frequency stabilities of the hydrogen atomic clocks (at the level of $10^{-15}$/day) applied in our experiments. In addition, we used 85-days original observations to determine the geopotential difference between two remote stations based on the CVSTT technique. Using more precise atomic or optical clocks, the CVSTT method for geopotential determination could be applied effectively and extensively in geodesy in the future.