论文标题
扩散耦合网络的强结构可控性:基于距离和零强迫的边界比较
Strong Structural Controllability of Diffusively Coupled Networks: Comparison of Bounds Based on Distances and Zero Forcing
论文作者
论文摘要
我们研究了扩散耦合网络的强结构可控性(SSC),其中外部控制输入仅注入一些节点,即领导者。对于此类系统,可控性的一种度量是强大结构可控子空间的维度,该尺寸等于可接受(正)耦合权重下最小的可控矩阵级别。在本文中,我们将两个紧密的下限在强结构可控子空间的维度上进行比较:一个基于追随者与领导者的距离,另一个基于图形着色过程,称为零强迫。我们表明,当领导者不构成零方面的集合时,基于距离的下限通常比基于零的框架更好。另一方面,我们还表明,可以证明可以通过基于距离的界限实现完整SSC的任何领导者都必须是零努力集。这些结果表明,虽然仅当焦点仅在验证完整的SSC上时,基于零努力的方法可能是可取的,但是当部分SSC也很感兴趣时,基于距离的方法通常更有信息。此外,我们还基于这两种方法的组合提出了一种新颖的界限,这种结合始终与两种界限的最大值一样,至少与某些情况下的最大值一样好。我们通过各种图和领导者集的数值结果来支持我们的分析。
We study the strong structural controllability (SSC) of diffusively coupled networks, where the external control inputs are injected to only some nodes, namely the leaders. For such systems, one measure of controllability is the dimension of strong structurally controllable subspace, which is equal to the smallest possible rank of controllability matrix under admissible (positive) coupling weights. In this paper, we compare two tight lower bounds on the dimension of strong structurally controllable subspace: one based on the distances of followers to leaders, and the other based on the graph coloring process known as zero forcing. We show that the distance-based lower bound is usually better than the zero-forcing-based bound when the leaders do not constitute a zero-forcing set. On the other hand, we also show that any set of leaders that can be shown to achieve complete SSC via the distance-based bound is necessarily a zero-forcing set. These results indicate that while the zero-forcing based approach may be preferable when the focus is only on verifying complete SSC, the distance-based approach is usually more informative when partial SSC is also of interest. Furthermore, we also present a novel bound based on the combination of these two approaches, which is always at least as good as, and in some cases strictly greater than, the maximum of the two bounds. We support our analysis with numerical results for various graphs and leader sets.