论文标题
RF和梯度波形的联合设计通过自动差异进行3D量身定制激发的MRI
Joint Design of RF and gradient waveforms via auto-differentiation for 3D tailored excitation in MRI
论文作者
论文摘要
本文提出了一种新的方法,用于磁共振成像(MRI)中射频(RF)和梯度波形的联合设计,并将其应用于3D的3D空间定制饱和度和反转脉冲的设计。两种波形的关节设计都以Ode Bloch方程为特征,没有已知的直接解。因此,现有方法通常依赖于基于简化的问题公式,例如,小调近似或将梯度波形限制为特定形状,通常仅适用于狭窄的设计目标集(例如,忽略硬件约束)的特定目标功能。本文开发并利用了自动差异的Bloch模拟器,直接计算了(Bloch模拟)激发模式的Jacobians,相对于RF和梯度波形。该方法与\ emph {nutary}亚差异损耗函数兼容,并直接优化了RF和梯度而无需限制波形形状。为了计算效率,我们得出明确的Bloch模拟器Jacobians(大约将计算时间和内存使用量减半)。为了强制执行硬件限制(峰值RF,梯度和振荡速率),我们使用变量的更改,使3D脉冲设计问题有效地不受限制;然后,我们使用建议的自动差异框架直接优化了结果问题。我们使用两种3D激发脉冲来证明我们的方法,这些脉冲无法通过常规方法轻松设计:外卷饱和(90°翻转角)和内量反转。
This paper proposes a new method for joint design of radiofrequency (RF) and gradient waveforms in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), and applies it to the design of 3D spatially tailored saturation and inversion pulses. The joint design of both waveforms is characterized by the ODE Bloch equations, to which there is no known direct solution. Existing approaches therefore typically rely on simplified problem formulations based on, e.g., the small-tip approximation or constraining the gradient waveforms to particular shapes, and often apply only to specific objective functions for a narrow set of design goals (e.g., ignoring hardware constraints). This paper develops and exploits an auto-differentiable Bloch simulator to directly compute Jacobians of the (Bloch-simulated) excitation pattern with respect to RF and gradient waveforms. This approach is compatible with \emph{arbitrary} sub-differentiable loss functions, and optimizes the RF and gradients directly without restricting the waveform shapes. For computational efficiency, we derive and implement explicit Bloch simulator Jacobians (approximately halving computation time and memory usage). To enforce hardware limits (peak RF, gradient, and slew rate), we use a change of variables that makes the 3D pulse design problem effectively unconstrained; we then optimize the resulting problem directly using the proposed auto-differentiation framework. We demonstrate our approach with two kinds of 3D excitation pulses that cannot be easily designed with conventional approaches: Outer-volume saturation (90° flip angle), and inner-volume inversion.