论文标题
使用WCAG工具和剑桥模拟器对网站的可访问性评估
Accessibility evaluation of websites using WCAG tools and Cambridge Simulator
论文作者
论文摘要
有大量工具可自动评估有关WCAG的Web可访问性。本文将WCAG工具及其结果比较了Web开发人员的易于理解和实施。本文强调了仅通过符合WCAG工具而无法捕获的可访问性问题，并提出了通过包容性用户模型评估可访问性的其他方法。我们最初从W3网站中选择了十种WCAG工具，并在BBC的着陆页和谁网站上使用了一组此类工具。我们比较了他们的结果，从通用性，差异，细节量和可用性方面进行了比较。最后，我们简要介绍了包容性用户模型，并演示了用户交互的模拟如何捕获未通过WCAG分析检测到的可用性和可访问性问题。本文以通用用户资料格式的建议结束，该建议可用于比较和对比访问性系统和服务，并为具有不同能力范围的用户模拟和个性化交互。
There is plethora of tools available for automatic evaluation of web accessibility with respect to WCAG. This paper compares a set of WCAG tools and their results in terms of ease of comprehension and implementation by web developers. The paper highlights accessibility issues that cannot be captured only through conformance to WCAG tools and propose additional methods to evaluate accessibility through an Inclusive User Model. We initially selected ten WCAG tools from W3 website and used a set of these tools on the landing pages of BBC and WHO websites. We compared their outcome in terms of commonality, differences, amount of details and usability. Finally, we briefly introduced the Inclusive User Model and demonstrated how simulation of user interaction can capture usability and accessibility issues that are not detected through WCAG analysis. The paper concludes with a proposal on a Common User Profile format that can be used to compare and contrast accessibility systems and services, and to simulate and personalize interaction for users with different range of abilities.
