论文标题

设计日常的灵活性多载波市场:模型和清算算法

Designing Day-Ahead Multi-carrier Markets for Flexibility: Models and Clearing Algorithms

论文作者

Torbaghan, Shahab Shariat, Madani, Mehdi, Sels, Peter, Virag, Ana, Cadre, Hélène Le, Kessels, Kris, Mou, Yuting

论文摘要

多载体能源系统(尤其是气体和电力)的更高整合,以提高电力系统的运行灵活性并改善气体和电力网络中资源的分配。由于不同能源载体之间存在物理和经济依赖性,不同能源载体市场的整合是具有挑战性的。我们在本文中提出了综合的日间多载体气体,电力和热市场清算,其中包括这些订单上的新订单和约束,以代表转换和存储技术的技术经济限制。我们证明,拟议的市场清算会引起竞争均衡。此外,我们提出了两种分散的清除算法,在基础集中式清算优化问题的分解方面有所不同。这对所涉及的代理人及其相互信息交换具有含义。事实证明,它们产生的解决方案等同于在足够数量的迭代次数的温和假设下进行的集中式市场清算。我们认为,这种综合的多载体能源市场减轻了市场参与者面临的市场风险(现货)市场风险,并可以更好地对不同的能源运营商的定价。结果表明,如果他们只使用基本订单,转换/存储技术所有者将遭受损失和/或机会成本的损失。对于本文考虑的测试案例,与使用转换和存储订单相比,损失和机会成本的总和可以分别达到13,000欧元/天和9,000欧元/天。

There is an intrinsic value in higher integration of multi-carrier energy systems (especially gas and electricity), to increase operational flexibility in the electricity system and to improve allocation of resources in gas and electricity networks. The integration of different energy carrier markets is challenging due to the existence of physical and economic dependencies between the different energy carriers. We propose in this paper an integrated day-ahead multi-carrier gas, electricity and heat market clearing which includes new types of orders and constraints on these orders to represent techno-economic constraints of conversion and storage technologies. We prove that the proposed market clearing gives rise to competitive equilibria. In addition, we propose two decentralised clearing algorithms which differ in how the decomposition of the underlying centralised clearing optimisation problem is performed. This has implications in terms of the involved agents and their mutual information exchange. It is proven that they yield solutions equivalent to the centralised market clearing under a mild assumption of sufficient number of iterations. We argue that such an integrated multi-carrier energy market mitigates (spot) market risks faced by market participants and enables better spot pricing of the different energy carriers. The results show that conversion/storage technology owners would suffer from losses and/or opportunity costs, if they were obliged to only use elementary orders. For the test cases considered in this article, sum of losses and opportunity costs could reach up to 13,000 EUR/day and 9,000 EUR/day respectively, compared with the case where conversion and storage orders are used.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源