论文标题

基于AI标记的大规模AI文献挖掘

AI Marker-based Large-scale AI Literature Mining

论文作者

Yao, Rujing, Ye, Yingchun, Zhang, Ji, Li, Shuxiao, Wu, Ou

论文摘要

学术文献中包含的知识很有趣。受到生物化学领域的分子标记物的想法的启发,三个命名实体,即方法,数据集和指标被用作AI文献的AI标记。这些实体可用于追踪论文机构中描述的研究过程,该过程为寻求和挖掘更多有价值的学术信息提供了新的观点。首先,本研究中使用实体提取模型来从大规模AI文献中提取AI标记。其次,原始论文可追溯到AI标记。统计和传播分析是根据追踪结果进行的。最后,使用AI标记的共发生用于实现聚类。探索了方法集群中的演变以及不同研究场景簇之间的影响关系。上述基于AI标记的采矿产生了许多有意义的发现。例如,随着时间的发展,数据集上有效方法的传播正在迅速增加。近年来,中国提出的有效方法对其他国家的影响越来越大,而法国则相反。显着检测是一个经典的计算机视觉研究场景,最不可能受到其他研究场景的影响。

The knowledge contained in academic literature is interesting to mine. Inspired by the idea of molecular markers tracing in the field of biochemistry, three named entities, namely, methods, datasets and metrics are used as AI markers for AI literature. These entities can be used to trace the research process described in the bodies of papers, which opens up new perspectives for seeking and mining more valuable academic information. Firstly, the entity extraction model is used in this study to extract AI markers from large-scale AI literature. Secondly, original papers are traced for AI markers. Statistical and propagation analysis are performed based on tracing results. Finally, the co-occurrences of AI markers are used to achieve clustering. The evolution within method clusters and the influencing relationships amongst different research scene clusters are explored. The above-mentioned mining based on AI markers yields many meaningful discoveries. For example, the propagation of effective methods on the datasets is rapidly increasing with the development of time; effective methods proposed by China in recent years have increasing influence on other countries, whilst France is the opposite. Saliency detection, a classic computer vision research scene, is the least likely to be affected by other research scenes.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源