论文标题
带有开普勒行星的热星有高倾斜度
Hot Stars With Kepler Planets Have High Obliquities
论文作者
论文摘要
十年来,热星带有热木星往往具有很高的斜率。关于热星和其他类型的行星的热星的自旋轨道对齐程度知之甚少。在这里,我们根据其投影旋转速度(VSINI)的光谱测量值(VSINI),重新评估具有小于Neptune的热开普勒恒星的斜率。该方法的基础是,较低的倾斜(所有其他事物都是平等的)会导致Sini更接近统一并增加Vsini的价值。我们使用有效温度在5950至6550k之间的150个开普勒恒星的样品和101颗恒星具有匹配的光谱特性和随机取向的101颗恒星的对照样品寻求证据。行星宿主的VSINI值比对照恒星具有更高的VSINI值,但不足以与完美的自旋轨道对齐兼容。 Sini的平均值为0.856 +/- 0.036,距离统一(完美对齐)4-偏远,远离PI/4(随机取向)。也有证据表明,最热的恒星具有更宽的倾斜分布:分别建模时,恒星比6250k较冷的恒星具有<sini> = 0.928 +/- 0.042,而较热的恒星与随机方向一致。这类似于先前带有热木星的恒星所指出的模式。基于这些结果,早期G和晚-F恒星的倾斜激发似乎是恒星和行星形成的一般结果,而不是与热木星的形成仅相关。
It has been known for a decade that hot stars with hot Jupiters tend to have high obliquities. Less is known about the degree of spin-orbit alignment for hot stars with other kinds of planets. Here, we re-assess the obliquities of hot Kepler stars with transiting planets smaller than Neptune, based on spectroscopic measurements of their projected rotation velocities (vsini). The basis of the method is that a lower obliquity -- all other things being equal -- causes sini to be closer to unity and increases the value of vsini. We sought evidence for this effect using a sample of 150 Kepler stars with effective temperatures between 5950 and 6550K and a control sample of 101 stars with matching spectroscopic properties and random orientations. The planet hosts have systematically higher values of vsini than the control stars, but not by enough to be compatible with perfect spin-orbit alignment. The mean value of sini is 0.856 +/- 0.036, which is 4-sigma away from unity (perfect alignment), and 2-sigma away from pi/4 (random orientations). There is also evidence that the hottest stars have a broader obliquity distribution: when modeled separately, the stars cooler than 6250K have <sini> = 0.928 +/- 0.042, while the hotter stars are consistent with random orientations. This is similar to the pattern previously noted for stars with hot Jupiters. Based on these results, obliquity excitation for early-G and late-F stars appears to be a general outcome of star and planet formation, rather than being exclusively linked to hot Jupiter formation.