论文标题
在不同程度的光度和几何变换下,按键点检测器和二进制描述符的性能分析
Performance Analysis of Keypoint Detectors and Binary Descriptors Under Varying Degrees of Photometric and Geometric Transformations
论文作者
论文摘要
通过功能匹配检测图像对应关系构成了众多计算机视觉应用程序的基础。过去已经提出了几个检测器和描述符,以解决图像中的兴趣点(关键点)的有效生成。在本文中,我们研究了八个二进制描述符(Akaze,BoostDESC,简短,轻快,怪胎,闩锁,Lucid和Orb)和八个兴趣点探测器(Agast,Akast,Akaze,Amaze,Brisk,Fast,harrislapalce,harrislapalce,kaze,Orb,Orb和Stardetector)。我们已将检测和描述阶段解耦,以分析兴趣点检测器,然后评估不同检测器和描述子的成对组合的性能。我们在标准数据集上进行了实验,并在不同的图像转换下分析了每种方法的比较性能。 We observed that: (1) the FAST, AGAST, ORB detectors were faster and detected more keypoints, (2) the AKAZE and KAZE detectors performed better under photometric changes while ORB was more robust against geometric changes, (3) in general, descriptors performed better when paired with the KAZE and AKAZE detectors, (4) the BRIEF, LUCID, ORB descriptors were relatively faster, and (5) none of在几何变换下,描述符的表现特别出色,只有轻快,怪胎和阿卡兹表现出合理的弹性。
Detecting image correspondences by feature matching forms the basis of numerous computer vision applications. Several detectors and descriptors have been presented in the past, addressing the efficient generation of features from interest points (keypoints) in an image. In this paper, we investigate eight binary descriptors (AKAZE, BoostDesc, BRIEF, BRISK, FREAK, LATCH, LUCID, and ORB) and eight interest point detector (AGAST, AKAZE, BRISK, FAST, HarrisLapalce, KAZE, ORB, and StarDetector). We have decoupled the detection and description phase to analyze the interest point detectors and then evaluate the performance of the pairwise combination of different detectors and descriptors. We conducted experiments on a standard dataset and analyzed the comparative performance of each method under different image transformations. We observed that: (1) the FAST, AGAST, ORB detectors were faster and detected more keypoints, (2) the AKAZE and KAZE detectors performed better under photometric changes while ORB was more robust against geometric changes, (3) in general, descriptors performed better when paired with the KAZE and AKAZE detectors, (4) the BRIEF, LUCID, ORB descriptors were relatively faster, and (5) none of the descriptors did particularly well under geometric transformations, only BRISK, FREAK, and AKAZE showed reasonable resiliency.