论文标题
回复有关“从单个发射器到宏观设备的热，量子抗启动和激光阈值”的评论
Reply to the Comment on "Thermal, quantum antibunching and lasing thresholds from single emitters to macroscopic devices"
论文作者
论文摘要
我们解构并向Carroll等人发表评论。 [Phys Rev Lett 126，063902（2021）]（PRL）已发布在Arxiv上的两个版本[arxiv：2106.15242v1]和[arxiv：2106.15242v2]。该评论声称，PRL中介绍的模型中的一个术语已被错误省略，因此，PRL中模型预测的激光阈值是无法实现的。我们表明，该术语被正确忽略了，因为它代表了在PRL中建模的设备中无法观察到的集体效应。此外，即使要包括这个术语，激光阈值仍然存在，这与评论中声称的相反。我们得出的结论是，PRL中介绍的模型是正确的，其结果是创新的，并且在激光物理和量子光学器件中具有广泛的应用。
We deconstruct and address a comment to Carroll et al. [Phys Rev Lett 126, 063902 (2021)] (PRL) that has been posted on arXiv appearing as two versions [arXiv:2106.15242v1] and [arXiv:2106.15242v2]. This comment claimed that a term in the model presented in the PRL had been incorrectly omitted and that, hence, the laser threshold predicted by the model in the PRL is unattainable. We show that the term in question was correctly neglected because it represents collective effects that are not observable in the devices modelled in the PRL. Moreover, even if this term were to be included, the laser threshold would still be present, contrary to what was claimed in the comment. We conclude that the model presented in PRL is correct and that its results are innovative and of wide application in laser physics and quantum optics.
