论文标题
深度学习和机器学习的系统评价
Systematic review of deep learning and machine learning for building energy
论文作者
论文摘要
建筑能源(BE)管理在城市可持续性和智能城市中起着至关重要的作用。最近,新型的数据科学和数据驱动的技术在分析智能能源管理的能源消耗和能源需求数据集方面已显示出重大进展。尤其是机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL)方法和应用,已经有望发展准确和高性能的能量模型。本研究对用于处理系统的基于ML和DL的技术进行了全面综述,并进一步评估了这些技术的性能。通过系统的审查和全面的分类法,仔细研究了基于ML和DL的技术的进步,并引入了有前途的模型。根据对能源需求预测的结果,杂化和集合方法位于高鲁棒性范围内,基于SVM的方法位于良好的鲁棒性限制中,基于ANN的方法位于中等鲁棒性限制中,线性回归模型位于低鲁耐度限制中。另一方面,用于耗能预测,基于DL的,混合和基于合奏的模型提供了最高的鲁棒性评分。 ANN,SVM和单个ML模型提供了良好的和中鲁棒性,基于LR的模型提供了较低的鲁棒性评分。此外,对于能量载荷预测,基于LR的模型提供了较低的鲁棒性评分。混合和合奏的模型提供了更高的鲁棒性评分。基于DL和基于SVM的技术提供了良好的鲁棒性得分,基于ANN的技术提供了中等鲁棒性得分。
The building energy (BE) management has an essential role in urban sustainability and smart cities. Recently, the novel data science and data-driven technologies have shown significant progress in analyzing the energy consumption and energy demand data sets for a smarter energy management. The machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods and applications, in particular, have been promising for the advancement of the accurate and high-performance energy models. The present study provides a comprehensive review of ML and DL-based techniques applied for handling BE systems, and it further evaluates the performance of these techniques. Through a systematic review and a comprehensive taxonomy, the advances of ML and DL-based techniques are carefully investigated, and the promising models are introduced. According to the results obtained for energy demand forecasting, the hybrid and ensemble methods are located in high robustness range, SVM-based methods are located in good robustness limitation, ANN-based methods are located in medium robustness limitation and linear regression models are located in low robustness limitations. On the other hand, for energy consumption forecasting, DL-based, hybrid, and ensemble-based models provided the highest robustness score. ANN, SVM, and single ML models provided good and medium robustness and LR-based models provided the lower robustness score. In addition, for energy load forecasting, LR-based models provided the lower robustness score. The hybrid and ensemble-based models provided a higher robustness score. The DL-based and SVM-based techniques provided a good robustness score and ANN-based techniques provided a medium robustness score.