论文标题

使用MARCS模型大气的晚期恒星的表面亮度颜色关系的理论分析

Theoretical analysis of surface brightness-colour relations for late-type stars using MARCS model atmospheres

论文作者

Salsi, A., Nardetto, N., Plez, B., Mourard, D.

论文摘要

表面亮度颜色关系(SBCR)主要用于恒星天体物理学的一般研究和确定乳层外距离。基于使用MARCS模型大气的晚期恒星的模拟光谱,我们的目的是分析恒星基本参数对表面亮度的影响。我们还比较了理论和最近的经验SBCR。我们使用MARCS模型大气来计算恒星的光谱和表面亮度。我们首先探索了MARCS的参数空间(即有效温度,$ \ log G $,$ \ mathrm {[Fe/h]} $,微逆转录和质量),以量化其对表面亮度的影响。然后,我们考虑了晚期和巨人的有效温度与$ \ log g $之间的关系,以及太阳金属性,以允许对理论和经验SBCR进行一致的比较。我们发现SBCR对微扰动和质量不敏感。对于矮人而言,金属性对SBCR的影响大于巨人。考虑较大的$ v-k_s $值时,它也更大。我们还发现,银河系和LMC SBCR之间的金属性差异为0.5 DEX不会影响最近的LMC距离确定,基于黯然失色的二进制文件,差异不超过0.4%。通过将理论与经验SBCR进行比较,我们发现F5-k7矮人和巨人星的良好协议小于2 $σ$,而M矮人和巨人的差异较大(约4-6 $σ$)。如在MARC中建模的表面重力特性解释了阶级经验SBCR的差异。我们最终发现,针对头虫的理论和经验SBCR是一致的。校准或使用SBCR时,请仔细考虑金属性和$ \ log G $是必须的。

Surface brightness-colour relations (SBCRs) are largely used for general studies in stellar astrophysics and for determining extragalactic distances. Based on simulated spectra of late-type stars using MARCS model atmospheres, our aim is to analyse the effect of stellar fundamental parameters on the surface brightness. We also compare theoretical and recent empirical SBCRs. We used MARCS model atmospheres to compute spectra and the surface brightness of stars. We first explored the parameter space of MARCS (i.e. effective temperature, $\log g$, $\mathrm{[Fe/H]}$, microturbulence, and mass) in order to quantify their impact on the surface brightness. Then we considered a relation between the effective temperature and $\log g$ for late dwarfs and giants, as well as a solar metallicity, in order to allow a consistent comparison of theoretical and empirical SBCRs. We find that the SBCR is not sensitive to the microturbulence and mass. The effect of metallicity on the SBCR is found to be larger for dwarfs than for giants. It is also larger when considering larger $V-K_s$ values. We also find that a difference of 0.5 dex in metallicity between Galactic and LMC SBCRs does not affect the recent LMC distance determination, based on eclipsing binaries, by more than 0.4%. By comparing theoretical with empirical SBCRs, we find a good agreement of less than 2$σ$ for F5-K7 dwarfs and giants stars, while a larger discrepancy is found for M dwarfs and giants (about 4-6$σ$). The surface gravity properties, as modelled in MARCS, explain the differences in the empirical SBCRs in terms of class. We finally find that theoretical and empirical SBCRs for Cepheids are consistent. Carefully considering metallicity and $\log g$ is mandatory when calibrating or using SBCRs.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源