论文标题
部分可观测时空混沌系统的无模型预测
Accounting for iron-related off-target binding effects of 18F-AV1451 PET in the evaluation of cognition and microstructure in APOE-e4+ MCI
论文作者
论文摘要
储层计算是预测湍流的有力工具,其简单的架构具有处理大型系统的计算效率。然而,其实现通常需要完整的状态向量测量和系统非线性知识。我们使用非线性投影函数将系统测量扩展到高维空间,然后将其输入到储层中以获得预测。我们展示了这种储层计算网络在时空混沌系统上的应用,该系统模拟了湍流的若干特征。我们表明,使用径向基函数作为非线性投影器,即使只有部分观测并且不知道控制方程,也能稳健地捕捉复杂的系统非线性。最后,我们表明,当测量稀疏、不完整且带有噪声,甚至控制方程变得不准确时,我们的网络仍然可以产生相当准确的预测,从而为实际湍流系统的无模型预测铺平了道路。
The pathology of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is characterized by the presence of beta-amyloid extracellular plaques and neurofibrillary tangles containing hyper-phosphorylated tau. Individuals carrying the apolipoprotein E-e4 (APOE-e4) allele are at increased risk of cognitive decline and developing AD pathology. The development of positron emission tomography (PET) radioligands sensitive to tau neurofibrillary tangles, such as 18F-AV1451, has allowed for visualization and assessment of AD pathology in vivo. The radioligand used in 18F-AV1451 binds with iron in addition to tau neurofibrillary tangles. We employ multimodal neuroimaging analyses, combining iron-sensitive measures from MRI with 18F-AV1451 PET, to examine off-target binding effects in cohorts of 20 APOE-e4 negative, 20 APOE-e4 positive MCI, and 29 control participants. Increased tau pathology, after controlling for tissue susceptibility, was found in the temporal lobe and hippocampus of APOE-e4+ MCI participants as compared to APOE-e4 negative MCI and control participants. Tau pathology in the hippocampus was significantly related to memory, but only in APOE-e4+ participants. Correlations between hippocampal 18F-AV1451 PET uptake and cognitive correlations did not significantly differ when correcting for the influence of iron on 18F-AV1451 PET signal. However, controlling for susceptibility was found to influence correlations between tau-PET uptake and diffusion metrics and the change in this interaction may be due to the influence of iron on diffusivity. Taken together, these results suggest that iron does not need to be accounted for in group comparisons of tau-PET uptake or correlations between cognitive measures and tau-PET SUVR. However, iron should be taken into account in correlations between diffusion measures and tau-PET uptake.