论文标题
关于协调观点数量与视觉分析之间关系的实证研究
An Empirical Study on the Relationship Between the Number of Coordinated Views and Visual Analysis
论文作者
论文摘要
协调的多个视图(CMV)是一种可视化技术,在单独但链接的视图中同时呈现多个可视化。有许多研究报告了CMV的优点(例如,找到隐藏关系的有用性)和缺点(例如,认知负荷)。但是,几乎没有关于视觉ANLAYSIS结果和过程的视图数量的影响的经验工作,这会导致视图数量和视觉Anlaysis之间的关系不确定性。在这项工作中,我们旨在调查协调观点数量与用户分析过程和结果之间的关系。为了实现目标,我们为视觉Anlaysis实施了CMV工具。我们还提供了工具中的可视化重复,以帮助用户轻松创建所需数量的可视化视图。我们对44名参与者进行了受试者间研究,我们要求参与者使用视觉工具解决五个分析问题。通过定量和定性分析,我们发现了观点数量和分析结果之间的正相关。我们还发现,可视化复制可以鼓励用户创建更多观点并采用各种分析策略。根据结果,我们提供了研究的含义和局限性。
Coordinated Multiple views (CMVs) are a visualization technique that simultaneously presents multiple visualizations in separate but linked views. There are many studies that report the advantages (e.g., usefulness for finding hidden relationships) and disadvantages (e.g., cognitive load) of CMVs. But little empirical work exists on the impact of the number of views on visual anlaysis results and processes, which results in uncertainty in the relationship between the view number and visual anlaysis. In this work, we aim at investigating the relationship between the number of coordinated views and users analytic processes and results. To achieve the goal, we implemented a CMV tool for visual anlaysis. We also provided visualization duplication in the tool to help users easily create a desired number of visualization views on-the-fly. We conducted a between-subject study with 44 participants, where we asked participants to solve five analytic problems using the visual tool. Through quantitative and qualitative analysis, we discovered the positive correlation between the number of views and analytic results. We also found that visualization duplication encourages users to create more views and to take various analysis strategies. Based on the results, we provide implications and limitations of our study.