论文标题

Skysurf:通过全天候HST全套表面亮度测量的黄道阳光和阿伽拉现代背景的限制:ii。在1.25、1.4和1.6微米处的扩散光线上的第一限制

SKYSURF: Constraints on Zodiacal Light and Extragalactic Background Light through Panchromatic HST All-Sky Surface-Brightness Measurements: II. First Limits on Diffuse Light at 1.25, 1.4, and 1.6 microns

论文作者

Carleton, Timothy, Windhorst, Rogier A., O'Brien, Rosalia, Cohen, Seth H., Carter, Delondrae, Jansen, Rolf, Tompkins, Scott, Arendt, Richard G., Caddy, Sarah, Grogin, Norman, Kenyon, Scott J., Koekemoer, Anton, MacKenty, John, Casertano, Stefano, Davies, Luke J. M., Driver, Simon P., Dwek, Eli, Kashlinsky, Alexander, Miles, Nathan, Pawnikar, Rushabh, Pirzkal, Nor, Robotham, Aaron, Ryan, Russell, Abate, Haley, Andras-Letanovszky, Hanga, Berkheimer, Jessica, Goisman, Zak, Henningsen, Daniel, Kramer, Darby, Rogers, Ci'mone, Swirbul, Andi

论文摘要

我们介绍了HST档案遗产项目“ Skysurf”的第一个结果。如Windhorst等人所述。 2022年,Skysurf利用大型HST档案研究了详细研究弥漫性紫外线,光学和近红外背景和前景。在这里,我们利用Skysurf的第一个天空表面亮度测量来限制近红外弥漫性播出外背景光(EBL)的水平。我们的天空表面亮度测量值已被验证至1%的准确性,当与HST相关的系统误差相结合时,每张图像中的Sky Brightness不确定性$ \ sim $ 2-4%$ \ simeq $ 0.005 mjy/sr。我们通过比较我们的初步天空测量$> 30,000美元的图像与Zodiacal Light模型,仔细选择了最黑暗的图像,以避免从流浪光污染中,我们将漫射ebl的量限制在三个近红外过滤器(F125W,F140W和F160W)中限制。此外,我们研究了仪器热发射对我们的测量的影响,发现它对F125W和F140W测量的影响有限,而HST精确热状态的不确定性会导致F160W图像中天体物理差异水平的显着不确定性。与Kelsall等人相比。 (1998)黄道十二二型模型,一种$ 30 $ nw m $^{ - 2} $ sr $^{ - 1} $的各向同性弥漫背景,而使用Wright(1998)Zodiacal模型会导致没有可识别的扩散背景。我们主要基于前景模型减法中的不确定性,我们提出限制29 nw m $^{ - 2} $ sr $^{ - 1} $,40 nw m $^{ - 2} $^{ - 2} $ sr $^{ - 2} $ sr $^{ - 1} $^{ - 1} $} $^M $ $^M $^$^{-22} $^{-sss sr F140W和F160W。尽管这种光通常是各向同性的,但此时我们的建模并不能区分宇宙学的起源或太阳系起源(例如昏暗的,弥漫性的,球形的彗星粉尘)。

We present the first results from the HST Archival Legacy project "SKYSURF." As described in Windhorst et al. 2022, SKYSURF utilizes the large HST archive to study the diffuse UV, optical, and near-IR backgrounds and foregrounds in detail. Here we utilize SKYSURF's first sky-surface brightness measurements to constrain the level of near-IR diffuse Extragalactic Background Light (EBL). Our sky-surface brightness measurements have been verified to an accuracy of better than 1%, which when combined with systematic errors associated with HST, results in sky brightness uncertainties of $\sim$2-4% $\simeq$ 0.005 MJy/sr in each image. We put limits on the amount of diffuse EBL in three near-IR filters (F125W, F140W, and F160W) by comparing our preliminary sky measurements of $> 30,000$ images to Zodiacal light models, carefully selecting the darkest images to avoid contamination from stray light. In addition, we investigate the impact that instrumental thermal emission has on our measurements, finding that it has a limited impact on F125W and F140W measurements, whereas uncertainties in the exact thermal state of HST results in significant uncertainties in the level of astrophysical diffuse light in F160W images. When compared to the Kelsall et al. (1998) Zodiacal model, an isotropic diffuse background of $30$ nW m$^{-2}$ sr$^{-1}$ remains, whereas using the Wright (1998) Zodiacal model results in no discernible diffuse background. Based primarily on uncertainties in the foreground model subtraction, we present limits on the amount of diffuse EBL of 29 nW m$^{-2}$ sr$^{-1}$, 40 nW m$^{-2}$ sr$^{-1}$, and 29 nW m$^{-2}$ sr$^{-1}$ for F125W, F140W, and F160W respectively. While this light is generally isotropic, our modeling at this point does not distinguish between a cosmological origin or a Solar System origin (such as a dim, diffuse, spherical cloud of cometary dust).

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源