论文标题
建模原始星际圆盘灰尘大小的世俗演化 - 粘性和磁性风盒之间的比较
Modelling the secular evolution of proto-planetary disc dust sizes -- A comparison between the viscous and magnetic wind case
论文作者
论文摘要
多年来,原始星际盘被认为是粘性的:角动量重新分布会导致积聚和向外盘扩散。最近,关于积聚的假设是由于通过磁风能去除角动量的假设获得了新的流行:在这种情况下,预期不会扩散椎间盘。在本文中,我们运行了几个一维气体和灰尘模拟,以对圆盘尺寸的时间进化进行预测\ textit {在灰尘中},并评估它们是否可以用于了解光盘的演变。我们表明粘性和磁性风模型具有非常不同的灰尘盘半径。特别是,MHD风模型是紧凑的,它们的尺寸要么保持恒定或随时间减小。相反,在粘性情况下(当$α\ gtrsim10^{ - 3} $时,光盘会随着时间的流逝而变大。尽管目前的观察结果缺乏足够的敏感性来区分这两种情况,但在$ 1 \,{\ rm to} \,10 \,{\ rm myr} $年龄范围内,更高敏感性调查可能会为这一目标富有成果。与可用的Alma Band 〜7数据相比,粘性和磁性风模型都与狼疮,Chamaeleon〜I和Upper Sco的观察性灰尘半径兼容。此外,在以漂移为主导的状态中,在杆〜7和3中,在狼疮中重现了尺寸 - 亮度相关性,而在上部的SCO中,较大的斜率与数据的斜率不同。子结构(潜在未发现)可以解释几个大小较大的异常值。在两个框架中,尤其是在上部SCO时代,更紧凑的椎间盘,更高角度分辨率的观察结果将有助于测试我们的预测。
For many years proto-planetary discs have been thought to evolve viscously: angular momentum redistribution leads to accretion and outward disc spreading. Recently, the hypothesis that accretion is due, instead, to angular momentum removal by magnetic winds gained new popularity: no disc spreading is expected in this case. In this paper, we run several one-dimensional gas and dust simulations to make predictions on the time-evolution of disc sizes \textit{in the dust} and to assess whether they can be used to understand how discs evolve. We show that viscous and magnetic wind models have very different dust disc radii. In particular, MHD wind models are compact and their sizes either remain constant or decrease with time. On the contrary, discs become larger with time in the viscous case (when $α\gtrsim10^{-3}$). Although current observations lack enough sensitivity to discriminate between these two scenarios, higher-sensitivity surveys could be fruitful to this goal on a $1\,{\rm to}\,10\,{\rm Myr}$ age range. When compared with the available ALMA Band~7 data, both viscous and magnetic wind models are compatible with the observationally-inferred dust radii in Lupus, Chamaeleon~I and Upper Sco. Furthermore, in the drift-dominated regime, the size-luminosity correlation is reproduced in Lupus, both in Band~7 and 3, while in Upper Sco a different slope than in the data is predicted. Sub-structures (potentially undetected) can explain several outliers with large observed sizes. Higher-angular-resolution observations will be helpful to test our predictions in the case of more compact discs, expected in both frameworks, particularly at the age of Upper Sco.