论文标题
评论“通过统计模型选择的贝尔质质量违规的不同因果关系实验裁决”
Comment on "Experimentally adjudicating between different causal accounts of Bell-inequality violations via statistical model selection"
论文作者
论文摘要
Daley等人在最近的一篇论文（物理学修订版A 105，042220（2022））中声称，某些超确定模型与标准的量子力学相反，因为这样的模型过于拟合了作者进行的贝尔型实验的统计数据。我们通过提供有关几乎没有超级确定模型的其他背景来增加讨论，并通过强调过度拟合，而不是与文献中给出的其他措施相比，过度拟合的措施更好，并不一定表明模型是普遍不好的。
In a recent paper (Phys. Rev. A 105, 042220 (2022)), Daley et al claim that some superdeterministic models are disfavoured against standard quantum mechanics, because such models overfit the statistics of a Bell-type experiment which the authors conducted. We add to the discussion by providing additional context about how few superdeterministic models fall into the category they analyse, and by emphasising that overfitting, while better as a measure of finetuning than other measures given in the literature, does not necessarily indicate a model is universally bad.
