论文标题
测试粒子模拟的保守特征:ii。指导中心和完整轨道的虚假加热,以$ {\ bf e} $和$ {\ bf b} $表示的波动。
Testing the conservative character of particle simulations: II. Spurious heating of guiding centers and full orbits subject to fluctuations expressed in terms of ${\bf E}$ and ${\bf B}$
论文作者
论文摘要
对于轴对称的托卡马克等离子体,哈密顿理论预测,带电颗粒的轨道必须保留在保守能量的不变性托架上,这是在沿圆环传播的固定角相速度传播的波的移动参考框架中。原则上,对于多型平面中的任意模式结构是正确的,但前提是,波动是用电势$φ$和$ {\ bf a} $表示的,从定义上讲,这满足了法拉第定律。在这里,我们使用物理字段$ {\ bf e} $和$ {\ bf b} $,在那些通过数值,近似值,近似值或总过失的数值,近似值,近似值,近似值,近似值,近似值,近似值或设计波浪场中引入的错误可能会违反法拉第定律。通过较短的时间步长可以减少由网格尺度上的噪声伪像引起的数值加热。相比之下,$ {\ bf e} $和$ {\ bf b} $之间的连贯不一致会导致潮流加速,该加速与时间步长或数值方法无关,但对几何形状敏感。特别是,当人们施加具有强大的上下不对称性的非正常模式而不是正常环形(特征)模式的通常不对称性时,我们表明世俗加速度会增强。我们的测试是针对完整的旋能和指导中心(GC)模型进行的,这些模型可产生相似的结果。此外,我们表明$ n $ - 点陀螺不是增强GC模拟现实主义的推荐方法。除了违反保护法外,在我们的示例中,$ n $ n $ point gyroveraging使GC结果远离了完整的轨道结果,这表明该方法甚至可以给出错误的趋势。
For an axisymmetric tokamak plasma, Hamiltonian theory predicts that the orbits of charged particles must stay on invariant tori of conserved energy in the moving frame of reference of a wave that propagates along the torus with a fixed angular phase velocity. In principle, this is true for arbitrary mode structures in the poloidal plane, but only if the fluctuations are expressed in terms of potentials $Φ$ and ${\bf A}$, which satisfy Faraday's law by definition. Here, we use the physical fields ${\bf E}$ and ${\bf B}$, where Faraday's law may be violated by errors introduced during the process of computing or designing the wave field through numerical inaccuracies, approximations, or gross negligence. Numerical heating caused by noise-like artifacts on the grid scale can to some extent be reduced via shorter time steps. In contrast, coherent inconsistencies between ${\bf E}$ and ${\bf B}$ cause spurious acceleration that is independent of time steps or numerical methods, but can be sensitive to geometry. In particular, we show that secular acceleration is enhanced when one imposes nonnormal modes that possess strong up-down asymmetry instead of the usual in-out asymmetry of normal toroidal (eigen)modes. Our tests are performed for full gyroorbit and guiding center (GC) models, which give similar results. In addition, we show that $N$-point gyroaveraging is not a recommendable method to enhance the realism of GC simulations. Besides breaking conservation laws, $N$-point gyroaveraging in our example makes the GC results deviate further from the full orbit results, showing that this method can even give the wrong trend.