论文标题
投票机制如何改善最高歧义的鲁棒性和普遍性?
How can voting mechanisms improve the robustness and generalizability of toponym disambiguation?
论文作者
论文摘要
自然语言文本(例如推文和新闻)中存在大量的地理信息。从文本中提取地理信息称为Geoparsing,其中包括两个子任务:顶级识别和偏见的歧义歧义,即确定上票的地理空间表示。本文重点介绍了最高的歧义,通常通过顶级分辨率和实体链接来处理。最近,已经提出了许多新颖的方法,尤其是基于深度学习的方法,例如camcoder,类型和眨眼。在本文中,提出了一种基于空间聚类的投票方法,该方法结合了几种单独的方法,以在鲁棒性和概括性方面提高SOTA性能。进行了实验,以将投票合奏与基于12个公共数据集的20种最新且常用的方法进行比较,其中包括几个高度模棱两可且具有挑战性的数据集(例如Wiktor和CLDW)。数据集有六种类型:推文,历史文档,新闻,网页,科学文章和维基百科文章,全球总共有98,300个位置。结果表明,投票合奏在所有数据集上表现最好,达到了平均准确性@161公里为0.86,证明了投票方法的普遍性和鲁棒性。此外,投票合奏会大大提高解决方案的良好位置的表现,即POI,自然特征和交通方式。
A vast amount of geographic information exists in natural language texts, such as tweets and news. Extracting geographic information from texts is called Geoparsing, which includes two subtasks: toponym recognition and toponym disambiguation, i.e., to identify the geospatial representations of toponyms. This paper focuses on toponym disambiguation, which is usually approached by toponym resolution and entity linking. Recently, many novel approaches have been proposed, especially deep learning-based approaches, such as CamCoder, GENRE, and BLINK. In this paper, a spatial clustering-based voting approach that combines several individual approaches is proposed to improve SOTA performance in terms of robustness and generalizability. Experiments are conducted to compare a voting ensemble with 20 latest and commonly-used approaches based on 12 public datasets, including several highly ambiguous and challenging datasets (e.g., WikToR and CLDW). The datasets are of six types: tweets, historical documents, news, web pages, scientific articles, and Wikipedia articles, containing in total 98,300 places across the world. The results show that the voting ensemble performs the best on all the datasets, achieving an average Accuracy@161km of 0.86, proving the generalizability and robustness of the voting approach. Also, the voting ensemble drastically improves the performance of resolving fine-grained places, i.e., POIs, natural features, and traffic ways.