论文标题

回复“评论顺序单杆生产,解释dibaryon $ d^*(2380)$ peach'''

Reply to "Comment on Sequential Single-pion Production Explaining the dibaryon $d^*(2380)$ peak''

论文作者

Molina, R., Ikeno, N., Oset, E.

论文摘要

在一篇评论[Arxiv:2106.00494]中,我们的论文````顺序的单杆铅生产解释了dibaryon $ d^*(2380)$ peace''作者提供了显然使我们的主张无效的论点,并呈现了他们称呼``dibaryon explion's''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''在此答复中,我们驳斥了评论的论点,并表明没有现有的实验证明了融合反应峰值的二骨性质。

In a comment [arXiv:2106.00494] to our paper on ``Sequential single-pion production explaining the dibaryon $d^*(2380)$ peak'' the authors provide arguments that apparently invalidate our claims and present what they call ``proofs'' of the dibaryon explanation of the $np\to π^0π^0d$ fusion reaction. In this reply we refute the arguments of the comment and show that no existing experiment proves the dibaryon nature of the peak of the fusion reaction.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源