论文标题
烛台和边界领域的恒星质量功能:自Z〜3起低质量被动星系的积累
The Stellar Mass Function in CANDELS and Frontier Fields: the build-up of low mass passive galaxies since z~3
论文作者
论文摘要
尽管近年来付出了重大努力,但通过宇宙时间导致被动星系形成的物理过程尚不清楚。恒星质量函数(SMF)的形状和演变可深入了解这些机制。利用烛台和深度哈勃前沿场(HFF)计划,我们估计了总的SMF,恒星形成和被动星系的SMF,从z = 0.25到Z = 2.75至前所未有的深度,并专注于后者的人群。被动星系的密度在过去11 GYR中发生了显着的演变。他们占附近宇宙中总质量的60%,而在z〜2.5时观察到的约20%。 HFF程序的包含使我们能够在Z> 1.5时首次检测到低质量的被动星系SMF中的特征上升,通常与环境淬火有关。我们观察到在不同的时间尺度上演变的两个被动星系的单独种群:大约一半的高质量系统已经在高红移时淬火,而低质量的被动星系逐渐在探测的红移范围内逐渐建立。在低质量的环境季度框架中,我们将此发现解释为环境在被动星系堆积随着时间的变化中越来越多的作用的证据。最后,我们将我们的发现与一组理论预测进行了比较。尽管在一些红移和质量间隔中达成了良好的一致性,但没有一个模型能够完全重现观测值。这要求在理论上和观察上进一步研究所涉及的物理机制,尤其是在全新的JWST数据上。
Despite significant efforts in the recent years, the physical processes responsible for the formation of passive galaxies through cosmic time remain unclear. The shape and evolution of the Stellar Mass Function (SMF) give an insight into these mechanisms. Taking advantage from the CANDELS and the deep Hubble Frontier Fields (HFF) programs, we estimated the SMF of total, star-forming and passive galaxies from z=0.25 to z=2.75 to unprecedented depth, and focus on the latter population. The density of passive galaxies underwent a significant evolution over the last 11 Gyr. They account for 60% of the total mass in the nearby Universe against ~20% observed at z~2.5. The inclusion of the HFF program allows us to detect, for the first time at z>1.5, the characteristic upturn in the SMF of passive galaxies at low masses, usually associated with environmental quenching. We observe two separate populations of passive galaxies evolving on different timescales: roughly half of the high mass systems were already quenched at high redshift, while low mass passive galaxies are gradually building-up over the redshift range probed. In the framework of environmental-quenching at low masses, we interpret this finding as evidence of an increasing role of the environment in the build-up of passive galaxies as a function of time. Finally, we compared our findings with a set of theoretical predictions. Despite good agreement in some redshift and mass intervals, none of the models are able to fully reproduce the observations. This calls for further investigation into the involved physical mechanisms, both theoretically and observationally, especially with the brand new JWST data.