论文标题
近场水下爆炸中气泡结构相互作用的计算分析
Computational Analysis of Bubble-Structure Interactions in Near-Field Underwater Explosion
论文作者
论文摘要
水下结构对近场爆炸的反应与爆炸气泡和周围水的动力学相结合。使用模型问题研究了该多相流体结构的相互作用过程,该模型问题具有薄壁铝制缸的屈服和塌陷。最近开发的计算框架将采用可压缩流体动力学求解器与结构动力学求解器。使用嵌入式边界和水平设置方法跟踪流体结构和液态气体界面。通过解决一维双层riemann问题来实现界面跨界面的保护定律。在不同的测试用例中,爆炸气泡内部的初始压力因两个数量级而变化。发现了三种不同的崩溃模式,包括水平塌陷(即一个叶向爆炸电荷延伸),它们似乎是违反直觉的,但在先前的实验室实验中已经观察到。由于模式的过渡,随着爆炸幅度的增加,结构达到自我接触所需的时间不会单调减少。对流场,气泡动力学和瞬态结构变形进行了可视化,以阐明每个崩溃模式和模式转变的原因。结果表明,爆炸气泡收缩产生的压力脉冲对结构的崩溃有显着影响。结构振动和气泡振荡之间的相差会影响结构的崩溃方式。此外,瞬态结构变形对气泡动力学具有明显的影响,导致双向相互作用。观察到远离结构的液体射流。与刚性壁附近的气泡产生的液体喷头相比,该射流在相反的方向上。
The response of underwater structures to a near-field explosion is coupled with the dynamics of the explosion bubble and the surrounding water. This multiphase fluid-structure interaction process is investigated using a model problem that features the yielding and collapse of a thin-walled aluminum cylinder. A recently developed computational framework that couples a compressible fluid dynamics solver with a structural dynamics solver is employed. The fluid-structure and liquid-gas interfaces are tracked using embedded boundary and level set methods. The conservation law across the interfaces is enforced by solving one-dimensional bimaterial Riemann problems. The initial pressure inside the explosion bubble is varied by two orders of magnitude in different test cases. Three different modes of collapse are discovered, including an horizontal collapse (i.e. with one lobe extending towards the explosive charge) that appears counterintuitive, yet has been observed in previous laboratory experiments. Because of the transition of modes, the time it takes for the structure to reach self-contact does not decrease monotonically as the explosion magnitude increases. The flow fields, the bubble dynamics, and the transient structural deformation are visualized to elucidate the cause of each collapse mode and the mode transitions. The result suggests that the pressure pulse resulting from the contraction of the explosion bubble has significant effect on the structure's collapse. The phase difference between the structural vibration and bubble oscillation influences the structure's mode of collapse. Furthermore, the transient structural deformation has clear effect on the bubble dynamics, leading to a two-way interaction. A liquid jet that points away from the structure is observed. Compared to the liquid jets produced by bubbles collapsing near a rigid wall, this jet is in the opposite direction.