论文标题
在径向 - 齐路EXB等离子体配置中对广义还原粒子中的粒子中的粒子核心方案的验证
Verification of the generalized reduced-order particle-in-cell scheme in a radial-azimuthal ExB plasma configuration
论文作者
论文摘要
在本文中,我们介绍了代表霍尔推进器的径向 - 齐路截面的跨电场和磁场构型中广义静电降低粒子中(PIC)方案的深入验证。模拟的设置遵循一个完善的基准案例。这项工作的主要目的是证明我们的新颖PIC方案可以可靠地解决大厅推进器的径向 - 齐路坐标中等离子体不稳定性的复杂二维动力学以及与完整2D PIC代码相比的一小部分计算成本。为此,我们首先介绍了新开发的Full-2D Pic Code的基准测试。接下来,我们概述了缩小订单的PIC方案和由此产生的“准2D”代码,并指出了准2D PIC中的订单降低程度是根据沿模拟方向的“区域”数量定义的,用于分裂计算域。我们比较了2D问题的各种近似值的准2D模拟的预测与我们的全2D仿真结果。我们表明,通过增加Q2D模拟中的区域数量,准2D结果会收敛到2D。尽管如此,我们还强调说,相对于完整2D模拟,计算成本降低5倍的准2D模拟可以以几乎无法区分的方式解决基本的物理过程,并且在离子数密度中仅造成最大误差约为10%,电子温度约为5%。
In this article, we present an in-depth verification of the generalized electrostatic reduced-order particle-in-cell (PIC) scheme in a cross electric and magnetic field configuration representative of a radial-azimuthal section of a Hall thruster. The setup of the simulations follows a well-established benchmark case. The main purpose of this effort is to demonstrate that our novel PIC scheme can reliably resolve the complex two-dimensional dynamics and interactions of the plasma instabilities in the radial-azimuthal coordinates of a Hall thruster at a fraction of the computational cost compared to full-2D PIC codes. To this end, we first present the benchmarking of our newly developed full-2D PIC code. Next, we provide an overview of the reduced-order PIC scheme and the resulting "quasi-2D" code, specifying that the degree of order reduction in the quasi-2D PIC is defined in terms of the number of "regions" along the simulation's directions used to divide the computational domain. We compare the predictions of the quasi-2D simulation in various approximation degrees of the 2D problem against our full-2D simulation results. We show that, by increasing the number of regions in the Q2D simulations, the quasi-2D results converge to the 2D ones. Nonetheless, we also highlight that a quasi-2D simulation that provides a factor of 5 reduction in the computational cost resolves the underlying physical processes in an almost indistinguishable manner with respect to the full-2D simulation and incurs a maximum error of only about 10 % in the ion number density and about 5 % in the electron temperature.